I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
富豪今后在做慈善时，从前的善事应继续做，但应该懂得升级、升维，应该“率众向义”，从自家生活细小处做起，淳厚天下风俗，至少不以自家粗鄙公布于众，带坏风气。
。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
free 30-day trial, then $14.99/month。业内人士推荐51吃瓜作为进阶阅读
be integrated with a wide range of web applications
Barnfield believes it will benefit processing plants to not have every council start collection on the same date.