Елизавета Гринберг (редактор)
During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
«Стакан апельсинового фреша 250 мл это 100–130 ккал. Облепиховый напиток с медом 300–400 миллиграмм это 150–250 килокалорий. Смузи из банана, ягод, йогурта и меда это 200–350 килокалорий. Модный боул с фруктами, гранолой, орехами и медом легко тянет на 400–700 килокалорий. И все это поверх обычной еды, а не вместо», — сказал эксперт.，更多细节参见服务器推荐
Note: This article contains affiliate links, meaning we make a small commission if you buy any premium plan from our link.
，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息
if the free list is scavanged. the general strategy is:。关于这个话题，safew官方版本下载提供了深入分析
Nature, Published online: 25 February 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-00599-5